Variants in Candidate Genes for Phenotype Heterogeneity in Patients with the 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome.

22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) is a microdeletion syndrome with a broad and heterogeneous phenotype, even though most of the deletions present similar sizes, involving ∼3 Mb of DNA. In a relatively large population of a Brazilian 22q11.2DS cohort (60 patients), we investigated genetic variants that could act as genetic modifiers and contribute to the phenotypic heterogeneity, using a targeted NGS (Next Generation Sequencing) with a specific Ion AmpliSeq panel to sequence nine candidate genes (CRKL, MAPK1, HIRA, TANGO2, PI4KA, HDAC1, ZDHHC8, ZFPM2, and JAM3), mapped in and outside the 22q11.2 hemizygous deleted region. In silico prediction was performed, and the whole-genome sequencing annotation analysis package (WGSA) was used to predict the possible pathogenic effect of single nucleotide variants (SNVs). For the in silico prediction of the indels, we used the genomic variants filtered by a deep learning model in NGS (GARFIELD-NGS). We identified six variants, 4 SNVs and 2 indels, in MAPK1, JAM3, and ZFPM2 genes with possibly synergistic deleterious effects in the context of the 22q11.2 deletion. Our results provide the opportunity for the discovery of the co-occurrence of genetic variants with 22q11.2 deletions, which may influence the patients´ phenotype.

Deletion of Chromosome 13 due to Different Rearrangements and Impact on Phenotype.

Patients with deletion of chromosome 13 present with variable clinical features, and the correlation between phenotype and genomic aberration is not well established in the literature, mainly due to variable sizes of the deleted segments and inaccuracy of breakpoint mapping. In order to improve the genotype-phenotype correlation, we obtained clinical and cytogenomic data from 5 Brazilian patients with different chromosome 13 deletions characterized by G-banding and array techniques. Breakpoints were nonrecurrent, with deletion sizes ranging from 3.8 to 43.3 Mb. Our patients showed some classic features associated with 13q deletion, independent of the location and size of the deletion: hypotonia, growth delay, psychomotor developmental delay, microcephaly, central nervous system anomalies, and minor facial dysmorphism as well as urogenital and limb abnormalities. Comparisons between the literature and our patients' data allowed us to narrow the critical regions that were previously reported for microphthalmia and urogenital abnormalities, indicating that gene haploinsufficiency of ARHGEF7, PCDH9 and DIAPH3, of MIR17HG and GPC6, and of EFNB2 may contribute to microcephaly, cardiovascular disease, and urogenital abnormalities, respectively. The knowledge about genes involved in the phenotypic features found in 13q deletion patients may help us to understand how the genes interact and contribute to their clinical phenotype, improving the patient's clinical follow-up.

22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome due to a Translocation t(6;22) in a Patient Conceived via in vitro Fertilization.

We report on a patient conceived via in vitro fertilization (IVF) with a 22q11.2 deletion due to an unusual unbalanced translocation involving chromosomes 6 and 22 in a karyotype with 45 chromosomes. Cytogenomic studies showed that the patient has a 3.3-Mb deletion of chromosome 22q and a 0.4-Mb deletion of chromosome 6p, which resulted in haploinsufficiency of the genes responsible for the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome and also of the IRF4 gene, a member of the interferon regulatory factor family of transcription factors, which is expressed in the immune system cells. The rearrangement could be due to the manipulation of the embryo or as a sporadic event unrelated to IVF. Translocation involving chromosome 22 in a karyotype with 45 chromosomes is a rare event, with no previous reports involving chromosomes 6p and 22q.

Cytogenetic and molecular evaluation and 20-year follow-up of a patient with ring chromosome 14.

We present a 20-year follow-up on a patient with a ring chromosome 14. The ring chromosome was studied by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), multiplex-ligation probe amplification (MLPA), and genome wide SNP array, and no deletions of chromosome 14 were detected, although the telomeric repeat sequence was absent from the ring chromosome. The patient had skeletal abnormalities, and susceptibility to infections, as well as seizures and retinal pigmentation, which are commonly found in individuals with a ring 14. Our patient corroborates the idea that even when no genes are lost during ring formation, a complete ring chromosome can produce phenotypic alterations, which presumably result from ring instability or gene silencing due to the new chromosomal architecture.